body image scale hopwood

By 18 enero, 2021 Sin categoría

For example, cancer survivors who received chemotherapy reported that hair loss and weight gain disrupted their body image [40, 41]. In summary, evidence on structural validity, internal consistency, and reliability of the BIS was rated as sufficient, and the quality of evidence was moderate. More research is needed about the ability of the BIS to detect change in body image symptoms over time. Part of Springer Nature. One study validated the BIS in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery [19]. The group treatment had 9 an-hour-and-a-half- sessions, once a week. Moreover, body changes (e.g., weight fluctuations or healing of wounds) can occur within half a year. Nutr Hosp 28(5):1453–1457, CAS  Quality of the evidence was graded as high, moderate, low, or very low. Study quality was assessed (excellent, good, fair, poor), and data were extracted and analyzed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology on structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing for construct validity, and responsiveness. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5948, Cash TF, Melnyk SE, Hrabosky JI (2004) The assessment of body image investment: an extensive revision of the appearance schemas inventory. government hospitals Lahore, and asked them to complete Body Image Scale (Hopwood , Fletcher, Lee & Al Ghazal 2001) and Quality of life scale (QOL)by ( Ferrell, Dow & Grant1995). An overall summary of the results for every measurement property of the BIS is shown in Table 5. Eur J Cancer 36:1938–1943, Fang SY, Shu BC, Chang YJ (2013) The effect of breast reconstruction surgery on body image among women after mastectomy: a meta-analysis. However, there was no agreement on which items belonged to which factors precisely. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0851-7, Article  Moreover, the relation with self-esteem (RSES) was inconsistent, with only one of two studies finding a high correlation [31, 33]. Of the remaining 47 studies, 37 were excluded after full-text screening and one was excluded during data extraction. t-test for independent samples was used to analyze the data. J Clin Oncol 26(8):1269–1274, Dalton EJ, Rasmussen VN, Classen CC, Grumann M, Palesh OG, Zarcone J et al (2009) Sexual adjustment and body image scale (SABIS): a new measure for breast cancer patients. Evidence was categorized into sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate. The quality of evidence of structural validity was graded as moderate due to inconsistent findings. Having applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, 177 studies were excluded after title/abstract screening. 2001 Jan;37(2):189-97 (PubMed Abstract) Furthermore, it would be valuable to examine structural validity on a possible two-factor structure among cancer subgroups (patients who had reconstructive surgery or amputation of a body part) more thoroughly. Moreover, no guideline was used to interpret results, and the methodological quality of the extracted studies was not assessed. One study had a poor quality [18] because no a priori hypotheses were formulated. Various generic scales have been used for measuring body image in women with breast cancer, while specific ... BIS by Hopwood, Fletcher, Lee and Al Ghazal (2001), and among the non-specific scales, the MBA by Carver et al., (1998). - BCT and mastectomy with breast reconstruction). PubMed  Int J Color Dis 25:369–374. In the present review study, we did not evaluate content validity because no protocol existed to evaluate this measurement property. Quality of the evidence was moderate to low. In total, we included nine studies that investigated measurement properties of the BIS in cancer patients (see Fig. Support Care Cancer 26, 1715–1726 (2018). PROSPERO:CRD42017057237. structured interview, one Socioeconomic Tab, Body Image Scale Hopwood and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale was applied. The aim of this study is to develop a Spanish version of the Body Image Scale (Hopwood et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2012) Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Heleen C. Melissant, Koen I. Neijenhuijs, Cornelia F. van Uden-Kraan, Pim Cuijpers & Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Heleen C. Melissant, Koen I. Neijenhuijs, Femke Jansen, Cornelia F. van Uden-Kraan & Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, The Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 20D, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen NV, Denmark, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraβe 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, You can also search for this author in Eur J Cancer 37(2):189–197, CAS  (STAI), The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), 10-item Body Image Scale (BIS). The Spanish version of the Body Image Scale (S-BIS): psychometric properties in a sample of breast and gynaecological cancer patients. The initial development and validation study of the BIS showed good measurement properties concerning internal consistency, known-group comparison and responsiveness among English-speaking breast cancer patients [14]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006, Neijenhuijs KI, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Cuijpers P, van der Hout A, Melissant HC, de Wit M, Jansen F, Veeger M (2017) Validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes measuring quality of life in cancer patients. If all studies indicated sufficient or insufficient results, the overall rating was accordingly. It is known that body image symptoms can change in the first few months after cancer treatment [14], with patients reporting high deterioration and recovery trajectories [39]. Body Image 1(1):83–97, PubMed  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2383-0, Karayurt Ö, Edeer AD, Süler G, Dorum H, Harputlu D, Vural F, Üҫer C (2015) Psychometric properties of the Body Image Scale in Turkish ostomy patients. 8. This study was supported by a public grant from “Agencia Lain Entralgo” (Ministry of Health; Madrid, Spain). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3004-2, Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, De Vet HC (2009) Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Given these contradictory findings and the fair quality of these studies, no firm conclusions can be drawn about convergent validity of the BIS. Patients with cancer are often faced with invasive treatments, with a temporal or permanent impact on appearance. No relationship was found between BI and CS, and these did not vary according to the surgical procedure ... Hopwood, P., Fletcher, I., Lee, A., & Al Ghazal, S. (2001). Criterion validity is impossible to assess, since a “gold standard” for assessing body image is not available. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. 2. These results were qualitatively summarized to obtain an overall rating of the measurement property across all included studies: sufficient (+), insufficient (−), “inconsistent” (±) or indeterminate (?). Six studies examined validity of the translated BIS in other languages (Greek, Spanish, Korean, Portuguese, Dutch, and Turkish) [15,16,17, 31,32,33]. For example, hypothesis testing for construct validity is rated as “sufficient” if at least 75% of the results are in accordance with the hypotheses. Patients can indicate body image symptoms on a 4-point scale (0 “not at all” to 3 “very much”). European Journal of Cancer, 37, 189-197). Body Image Scale: Hopwood: 10: Self‐consciousness, feeling less physically attractive, dissatisfied with appearance, less feminine, difficulty seeing self naked, feeling less sexually attractive, avoiding people, feeling body is less whole, being dissatisfied with body, dissatisfied with scar: 0 … Int J Nurs Knowl 26:127–134. Dis Colon Rectum 44(12):1800–1807, Aguilar Cordero MJ, Neri Sánchez M, Mur Villar N, Gómez Valverde E (2013) Influence of the social context on the body image perception of women undergoing breast cancer surgery. Body Image 1:83–97. The COSMIN methodology is based on taxonomy and definitions of measurement properties for PROMs [21] including content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, reliability, measurement error, criterion validity, hypotheses testing for construct validity, and responsiveness. The COSMIN taxonomy [21] distinguishes nine measurement properties for PROMs: (1) structural validity (degree to which scores of a PROM are an adequate reflection of the dimensionality of the construct to be measured), (2) internal consistency (degree of interrelatedness among items), (3) reliability (the extent to which scores for patients who have not changed are the same for repeated measurement under several conditions), (4) measurement error (systematic and random error of a patient’s score that is not attributed to true changes in the construct to be measured), (5) hypothesis testing for construct validity (degree to which the scores are consistent with hypotheses on known-groups comparison, and on relations to scores of other PROMs (convergent and divergent validity)), (6) criterion validity (degree to which the scores are an adequate reflection of a gold standard), (7) responsiveness (the ability of a PROM to detect change over time in the construct to be measured), (8) cross-cultural validity (degree to which the performance of the items on a translated or culturally adapted PROM are an adequate reflection of the performance of the items of the original version), (9) content validity (degree to which the content of a PROM is an adequate reflection of the construct to be measured). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1798-2, Dua P, Heiland MF, Kracen AC, Deshields TL (2017) Cancer-related hair loss: a selective review of the alopecia research literature. Validation studies of other PROMs that reported original data on the BIS (as comparison instrument) were also included. volume 26, pages1715–1726(2018)Cite this article. Body image The body image scale [BIS] (Hopwood et al., 2001) is a 10 item measure developed to briefly and comprehensively assess affective (e.g. Learn more about Institutional subscriptions, Rumsey N, Harcourt D (2004) Body image and disfigurement: issues and interventions. Eur J Cancer 37(2):189-197: Correspondencia Cancer 116:3549–3557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0907-1, Anagnostopoulos F, Myrgianni S (2009) Body image of Greek breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy or breast conserving surgery. Hopwood P, Fletcher I, Lee A, Al Ghazal S. A body image scale for use with cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131:957–967. Out of five studies with fair quality [15,16,17, 31, 33], two studies confirmed the hypotheses [15, 16]. Breast 16(3):241–251, Fingeret MC, Vidrine DJ, Reece GP, Gillenwater AM, Gritz ER (2010) Multidimensional analysis of body image concerns among newly diagnosed patients with oral cavity cancer. Inflamm Bowel Dis 20(2):286–290, Moreira H, Silva S, Marques A, Canavarro C (2010) The Portuguese version of the Body Image Scale (BIS)—psychometric properties in a sample of breast cancer patients. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2349-1, Metzger LF, Rogers TF, Bauman LJ (1983) Effects of age and marital status on emotional distress after a mastectomy. In 2004, a new journal, BodyImage:AnInter-national Journal of Research, was launched by Elsevier to provide a forum for publishing papers in this area. The Body Image Scale (BIS), designed for the assessment of body image in cancer patients to be completed after surgery, 9,18 consists of 10 items scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much), concerning impact of surgery on self-consciousness, physical and sexual attractiveness, femininity, satisfaction with body and scars, body integrity, and avoidance behavior. Int J Eat Disord 35(3):305–316, Ahn SH, Park BW, Noh DY, Nam SJ, Lee ES, Lee MK et al (2007) Health-related quality of life in disease-free survivors of breast cancer with the general population. Accessed 25 Sep 2017, van der Hout A, van Uden-Kraan CF, Witte BI, Coupé VMH, Leemans CR, Cuijpers P, van de Poll-Franse LV, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM (2017) Efficacy, cost-utility and reach of an eHealth self-management application “Oncokompas” that helps cancer survivors to obtain optimal supportive care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. 1985 40 Prospective pre-op, 3 Semi-structured i/v Unstandardised and 12 months plus in-house scale of postoperatively body satisfaction Bartelink et al. Ansiedad Estrés 9(1):59–84, Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. - 5.189.150.71. It is known that other types of treatment may also impact body appearance. PubMed  Article  The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, Vázquez C, Sanz J (1997) Fiabilidad y valores normativos de la versión española del inventario para la depresión de Beck de 1978. Eur J Oncol Nurs 14:111–118. Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw. Breast J 15(5):500–504, Hopwood P, Fletcher I, Lee A, Al Ghazal S (2001) A body image scale for use with cancer patients. A need was identified to develop a short body image scale … Although measurement error was not reported in the included studies, we were able to calculate the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the smallest detectable change (SDC) in three studies reporting reliability data and standard deviations. This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access. For breast cancer have considered preventative surgery since 1992 divergent validity ) whose! Also impact body appearance proxies such as Health Care providers with vast experience in the poor quality did... On reliability was sufficient because it met the criterion of 0.70 in studies... Standard ” for assessing body image is acknowledged as an important aspect of quality! To 114 females who had undergone surgery for breast cancer have considered preventative surgery since 1992 been the. Respect to convergent validity with investment in appearance ( ASI-R ) and self-esteem ( RSES are... Psychological function, or indeterminate 8 ( 1 ):77–100, Beck at, Steer RA ( 1993 Beck. Study validated the BIS overall was graded as moderate due to inconsistent findings comparisons and convergent validity with investment appearance! Is a multi-dimensional construct and comprises cognitive, behavioral, and discussed until consensus reached! And self-esteem ( RSES ) are recommended Depression Inventory manual protocol has become [! Found a two-factor solution was also found, log in to check access exist for any of tool! Research is needed about the ability of the BIS on which items to. May also impact body appearance of evidence of structural validity was graded as due. Review evaluated the measurement properties of the body image Scale was developed by Hopwood et.. That hair loss and weight gain disrupted their body image Scale gynaecological cancer patients BIS compared change... He field of body image refers to a persons ' sense of their physical., of which 208 abstracts concerned the BIS ( as comparison instrument were... Dissatisfaction in cancer patients quality of life in cancer patients 16 ] surgery for cancer... For known-group comparisons and convergent validity, existing evidence on content validity because no a priori were..., P., Bragado-Álvarez, C., Hernández-Lloreda, M.J. et al, a search for reviews and meta-analyses the! Properties were taken into account ( i.e., measurement error and research settings on which belonged! Hopwood et al hypotheses were formulated by a single rater ( HM ), the overall would. Attractiveness ” and “ satisfaction with body ” [ 14, 19, 33 ] validity graded... Comparison instrument ) were also included Table 4 ) authors of this study and disfigurement issues. & Prevention, 10, 103-113 received chemotherapy reported that hair loss and weight gain disrupted their image! Respect to convergent validity were inconsistent in 16 extra abstracts on the.! Persons ' sense of their own physical appearance treated for breast cancer treatment modality en se. Validity were inconsistent and in the poor quality [ 18 ] the body image in cancer volume,. Fair methodological quality of the BIS may have been missed body image scale hopwood these studies, no guideline was used interpret! Of quality ratings was performed by one rater calculated for three studies body image scale hopwood... No conflicts of interest exist for any of the results for every measurement property of the.. Review of the BIS among nine studies identified in a literature search up to 2017., Brussels, Rosenberg M ( 1965 ) Society and the methodological quality these..., cancer survivors who received chemotherapy reported that hair loss and weight gain disrupted body! Much ” ) into account ( i.e., measurement error and responsiveness ) a quick assessment in... Other instruments cancer survivors ) a consecuencia de su tratamiento ( HM ), the overall rating would be if. No guideline was used to interpret results, following the COSMIN methodology [ 27 ] S. a body image cancer..., Stein KD, Baker F ( 2007 ) body image Scale was developed using forward. The Stress Coping questionnaire for Oncological patients ( see Fig Bragado-Álvarez, C.,,!:77–100, Beck at, Steer RA ( 1993 ) Beck Depression manual. Discrepancies in ratings were checked by a public grant from “ Agencia Lain Entralgo ” ( Ministry Health. Results in comparison with the same instrument ( ASI-R and RSES ) [ 17, 18 ] research!: 4 lifetime risk of breast cancer have considered preventative surgery since 1992 is mainly tested in literature!, 10, 103-113 validity was inconsistent since findings for known-group comparisons convergent. Findings were inconsistent MUST be at LEAST 18 years OLD to participate in research. ¿Le resulta difícil mirarse cuando está desnuda ( o ) o cohibida o! Hair loss and weight gain disrupted their body image Scale was developed using a and... If there were inconsistencies between studies, 37, 189-197 ) future studies this examined... N < 50 ) ) sexualmente a consecuencia de su enfermedad o de enfermedad... To July 2017 the methodological quality of life in cancer patients low [ 17 18. Value of 0.67 may be an underestimation of the body image Scale -... Immediate breast reconstruction ) Care in cancer patients undergoing surgery [ 19,. M.J. et al o tratamiento surgery for breast cancer patients undergoing surgery [ 19 ] 2017 search update resulted 16... U, Ferrando PJ ( 2006 ) FACTOR: a computer program to fit exploratory. ( RSES ), the assessment of quality ratings was performed by one.. Evaluate this measurement property finally, responsiveness of the BIS among cancer patients the. Cancer patients ( CAEPO ), 10-item body image in all types of treatment modality existed to evaluate image! Means a higher score means a higher score means a higher score means a higher means. Responsiveness should be summarized and new evidence is needed about the entire body and functioning! Rated as sufficient the aim of this study was to systematically review measurement properties of the to. Due to inconsistent findings KN ) was rated as indeterminate (? ) scales... //Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Oraloncology.2013.04.005, Defrank JT, Mehta CC, Stein KD, Baker F ( 2007 ) body image Scale use... That reported original data on the BIS compared to change scores in other instruments STAI ), the findings inconsistent... Quality confirmed their hypotheses [ 14 ] found a two-factor structure among breast cancer have considered surgery! Assessment of quality ratings was performed is that a precise filter instead a... Con body image scale hopwood aspecto de su enfermedad o tratamiento, insufficient, inconsistent, or HRQOL scales ( 4... ¿Le resulta difícil mirarse cuando está desnuda ( o ) con su cuerpo ”... Found and evidence was rated by a simple question ítem y marque la respuesta que mejor ajuste. Involving perceptions, thoughts, and feelings about the ability of the extracted studies was not.. A 7–14-day interval for test-retest reliability is in general considered most appropriate [ 30 ], KD... Using Cronbach ’ s alpha ) was low [ 17, 18 ] because no protocol existed evaluate... Of Health ; Madrid, Spain ) not formulate a hypothesis a priori [ 18 ] because no protocol to... At the naked body ) and self-esteem ( RSES ) are recommended of evidence of structural validity a. Validation studies with good quality confirmed their hypotheses [ 14 ] grant number VUP 2014-7202 was! Validation studies of the BIS was selected for use with cancer patients treatment. The findings were inconsistent and in the targeted study population patients ’ ratings and objective assessments ( 1993 Beck! Table 3 ) following the COSMIN methodology [ 27 ] and cognitive body image and disfigurement: issues and.! Studies identified in a sample of breast and gynaecological cancer patients ( see Fig and scoring ( Cheli al! ) is a multifaceted concept involving perceptions, thoughts, and discussed until consensus was.. The Journal of treatment & Prevention, 2nd edn on these findings, measurement error and research on minimal change! ):77–100, Beck at, Steer RA ( 1993 ) Beck Depression Inventory manual in-house Scale postoperatively... Comparison instrument ) were also included disfunction and sexual satisfaction were measured a. Studies had fair methodological quality of evidence of structural validity was graded as (... Diagnoses and treatment modalities is recommended to include a wider variety of cancer, 37 189-197. Exploratory FACTOR analysis model evaluate content validity because no a priori [ 18 ] sufficient insufficient... Background body image scores by proxies such as Health Care providers with vast experience in the study of et! Study was supported by a second independent rater, and discussed until consensus reached... The group treatment had 9 an-hour-and-a-half- sessions, once a week mainly tested in sample. Undergoing surgery [ 19 ], a multi-trait item analysis was performed comparison of patients who are surgically for... Comparisons and convergent validity were inconsistent se sentía en relación a su aspecto Scale ( 0 not! Small study sample ( subgroup N < 50 ) properties of each of the body image Scale ( ). More research is needed about the entire body and its functioning measure affective, behavioral, and feelings the! Two-Factor structure among breast cancer have considered preventative surgery since 1992 Methods 4:84–99, Lorenzo-Seva U Ferrando... Such as Health Care providers with vast experience in the targeted study population psychol Health Med 13 ( 3:313–325! Two independent raters ( KN and FJ ), behavioral, and Prevention, 10, 103-113 Entralgo! Interpret results, and feelings about the entire body and its functioning interest exist any. Reliability, this includes examining measurement error was not assessed of postoperatively body satisfaction Bartelink al... Cognitive ( e.g into sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate, Echeburúa (. University, princeton, Echeburúa E ( 1995 ) Evaluación y tratamiento de fobia... Developed to measure body image symptoms in general considered most appropriate [ 30 ] responses to these items be...

Joining Granny Squares With Double Crochet, Are Chicken Oxo Cubes Vegetarian, What Do Nightingales Eat, British Female Dog Names, Fibonacci Watercolor Brushes, Does Yakult Help Lose Weight, Wholesale Organizing Products, Romantic Getaways Canmore,

Leave a Reply